![]() ![]() Mary McCaulley, a clinical psychologist at the University of Florida.Īfter the death of Myers, her work was continued by a variety of experts, among whom most are doctoral level psychologists. In later years, Myers also worked closely on MBTI research projects with Dr. Both Briggs and Myers spent many years studying Jung’s theory of psychological types in order to create the assessment. While neither Myers nor Briggs were psychologists, they based the MBTI assessment on the work of Carl Jung, Swiss psychiatrist, psychoanalyst, and founder of analytical psychology. During the time period when the MBTI ® assessment was initially being developed (mid 1940s to 1950), only 3 to 5 percent of women and only 5 to 7 percent of men held a bachelor’s degree in the United States. Were Briggs and Myers qualified psychologists?īriggs earned a bachelor’s degree with honors in agriculture from the Michigan Agricultural College (now Michigan State University) and Myers achieved a bachelor’s degree with honors in political science from Swarthmore College in Pennsylvania. How do I find out more about the MBTI ® assessment? What are the ethical use guidelines for the MBTI ® assessment? ![]() Does the MBTI ® assessment have a scientific basis? I have heard the MBTI ® assessment “puts people into a box.” Does it? I’ve heard the MBTI ® assessment is a personality type questionnaire, not a trait questionnaire. How should I interpret the results of my MBTI ® assessment? Is the MBTI ® assessment available for free online? How is the MBTI ® assessment related to Jung’s theory? ![]() Does the MBTI ® assessment describe my whole personality? Can the MBTI ® assessment be used for selection or hiring? What can the MBTI ® assessment be used for? What is the history of the MBTI ® assessment? Who created the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator ® (MBTI ®) assessment? Today thousands of psychologists use the MBTI assessment for appropriate non-diagnostic applications. ![]() The MBTI assessment is designed to be descriptive of the typical characteristics of people with different personality types, not to be diagnostic. "Psychologists don't use the MBTI assessment." Clinical psychology is largely focused on the diagnosis and treatment of psychopathology. It is unethical, and in many cases illegal, to require job applicants to take the Indicator if the results will be used to screen out applicants. Organizations that wrongly use the MBTI assessment for hiring decisions are confusing preference with skill, and are doing themselves a disservice in their hiring process by screening out potentially qualified applicants. "The MBTI assessment isn't predictive." The MBTI assessment is designed to be descriptive, not predictive. The MBTI ® Form M Manual Supplement (2009) shows test-retest reliabilities up to four years ranging from. Research in the MBTI ® Manual shows that over a 4-week retest period, 65 percent of respondents had all four preferences the same, and 93 percent had three or four the same. Yet this widely circulated number originates from a 1993 study citing an even older 1979 study based on an outdated form of the MBTI instrument, not the current version. "The MBTI assessment isn't reliable." Articles that criticize the MBTI assessment often quote a statistic from David Pittenger that claims a 50 percent retest rate over a 5-week retest period. Here are some direct responses to a few common misconceptions: You'll find information that clarifies reliability and validity, and explanations of the interactive feedback process which is integral to the MBTI experience. A good place to start when you want to verify material you encounter is Trusting MBTI ® Information on the web. This website is designed to act as your guide to accurate and research-based information about psychological type, along with use and applications of the MBTI ® instrument. Many of these myths can be traced back to misunderstandings about the framework of the MBTI assessment, and incorrect assumptions about the characteristics of the instrument and the way it is designed to be used. These inaccuracies might lead to questions about the Indicator's value and efficacy. As you explore concepts of personality type and the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator ® (MBTI ®) assessment, you may encounter information on the web that is rooted in misconceptions about the Indicator. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |